tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post990875106236921069..comments2023-08-12T17:16:40.858+05:30Comments on Bright Sparks: Why did communism as an economic philosophy not succeedGyan Cloudhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07261375536957176336noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-41522440322518914802016-09-06T23:31:45.303+05:302016-09-06T23:31:45.303+05:30Sir i quite well satisfied from your point ..Sir i quite well satisfied from your point ..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12719465086152893036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-25869582696039583632016-09-06T23:30:04.675+05:302016-09-06T23:30:04.675+05:30By and large communist philosophy can only be fit ...By and large communist philosophy can only be fit for ancient society of humans where there is no class , there is no division of labor and surplus .Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12719465086152893036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-34740070498006818302016-09-02T23:23:13.694+05:302016-09-02T23:23:13.694+05:30Excellent sir... Excellent sir... Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03776929589130180386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-32370875585882324162016-08-20T20:51:34.894+05:302016-08-20T20:51:34.894+05:30Sir,
Communism is that kind of philosophy which i...Sir, <br />Communism is that kind of philosophy which is practically not possible.As we have seen that the countries like China and Russia were collapsed totally and they made a new kind of communism which is favourable for them. The 3rd point you mentioned about "Reporting the correct numbers" seems to be a biggest drawback of Communism Philosophy for economy.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02401352301609847793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-13017830396191285382016-07-30T19:13:03.657+05:302016-07-30T19:13:03.657+05:30china is no more a communist nation .Its economic ...china is no more a communist nation .Its economic policy is state owned capitalism.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12485762124281684433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-81373412234633887922016-07-25T12:34:48.062+05:302016-07-25T12:34:48.062+05:30
As theory communism is considered as individual ...<br /> As theory communism is considered as individual well being.when I say well being it not mean that only economic well being, as a egalitarian society it also mean that free from all false consciousness and nonsense that a society create over hundreds of year to control the proletariat(the pillars -farmer,labour etc).But if we see the spectrum of communism in past we will observe that it is the most terrible society where individual is deprive from there basic need.There are killed, murdered , raped etc in the name of social well being.<br /><br />Now the question is why they faild??<br />I think a society with individual well being is only survive when individual understand the basis of life or the basic human aspiration .Without understanding this you try to build a nation is a disaster DISAKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11113175792269891462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-48455421874422848942016-07-04T20:01:53.215+05:302016-07-04T20:01:53.215+05:30Dear Sir, I feel the points mentioned here do not ...Dear Sir, I feel the points mentioned here do not describe why Communism as an economic theory is a failure. This post articulates why Communism failed at a global level due to power going into the wrong hands. <br /><br />I feel that Communism as a theory carries the seeds of its own doom because it tries to go against the law of nature. The ultimate aim of Communism is equality for all. I feel that the world itself is not designed to be egalitarian and the idea of an egalitarian society is only utopian. As long as humans exist, there shall be inequality. The world was and is still governed by the principle of 'survival of the fittest'. That is how homo sapiens sapiens emerged victorious over all other species. The drive to distinguish oneself from others is what keeps this world ticking. What Communism offers is a very unstable state of affairs, however satisfying it might sound.Varun Sharmanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-20048221743320204552016-07-03T18:05:26.186+05:302016-07-03T18:05:26.186+05:30Sir,
It is a very informative blog. In back-sight ...Sir,<br />It is a very informative blog. In back-sight we are seeing the dark truth of communism. And present condition of China & Russia and other communist nation. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11120668439466955645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-60729343213707097272016-06-29T18:34:05.414+05:302016-06-29T18:34:05.414+05:30Thanks everyone for reading and commenting!Thanks everyone for reading and commenting!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11843171978811719595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-78593542921946221362016-06-25T20:47:20.263+05:302016-06-25T20:47:20.263+05:30Excellent write-up sir. Continue writing and educa...Excellent write-up sir. Continue writing and educating. Mr. Indiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09893767755452115339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-19035635633040194742016-06-24T01:20:39.473+05:302016-06-24T01:20:39.473+05:30Informative and well written Informative and well written Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01713104350780279458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-34605628795000801212016-06-23T23:54:41.796+05:302016-06-23T23:54:41.796+05:30जहाँ ज्यादातर देश ये मान चुके हैं कि लोकतंत्र शासन...जहाँ ज्यादातर देश ये मान चुके हैं कि लोकतंत्र शासन<br />करने का सबसे सफल माडल है। वहीँ लगभग सभी<br />साम्यवादी देश या तो एक दल या दल की आड़ में एक व्यक्ति के द्वारा हांकें जा रहें हैं।<br />जहाँ व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता को कुचला जा रहा है और राजनितिक हत्याएं लगातार हो रही हैं।<br />जहाँ तक दो बड़े साम्यवादी देश चीन और रूस का प्रश्न है, इन दोनों देशों के तानाशाहों मावो और स्टालिन के बीच विश्वास की कमी। और एक दुसरे के प्रति<br />अपने को श्रेष्ठ साबित करने के कारण, और दोनों देशों<br />की क्रांति में सर्वहारा वर्ग की परिभाषा का बदल जाना भी रहा। जैसे चीन में इसका मतलब कृषि मजदुर और छोटे किसान था,वहीँ रूस में यह फेक्ट्री मजदुर। इन वजहों से इनकी दोस्ती<br />कभी ना हो पायी । जो अमेरिका के लिए फायदेमंद साबित हुआAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14565349942222253870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-70521707101385431122016-06-23T22:06:35.784+05:302016-06-23T22:06:35.784+05:30Fantastic and succinct analysis Sir����Fantastic and succinct analysis Sir����Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12415892648515456674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8647794548092946175.post-19729605541504844222016-06-23T18:29:54.047+05:302016-06-23T18:29:54.047+05:30आज की दुनिया में उस साम्यवाद का लगभग पतन हो चुका ह...आज की दुनिया में उस साम्यवाद का लगभग पतन हो चुका है, जिसकी कार्ल मार्क्स ने कल्पना की थी एवं जिसकी प्रायोगिक नींव लेनिन ने रखी थी। सोवियत संघ साम्यवाद के मार्ग से तभी भटक गया था जब स्टालिन ने सत्ता में आकर विस्तारवादी नीति अपनाई। चीन का साम्यवाद से लोगों की भलाई कम और लोगों की हत्याऐं ज्यादा हुई(माउ के कार्यकाल मे)। आज चीन मे सत्ता चंद लोगों के हाथों में है। समतावादी समाज जो कि साम्यवाद की आधारशिला है, इस अवधारणा का पूर्णत: पतन हो चुका है। <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07794690794806556871noreply@blogger.com